Funding Areas - Program Descriptions
Domestic Biodiversity Program
Foundation grantmaking in the U.S. has historically concentrated on the Pacific Northwest, that is Northern California, Oregon, and Washington, and up to British Columbia and Southeast Alaska. This reflects a longstanding interest in coastal temperate forests, which also extends into the Southern Hemisphere of the Americas. Currently, our grantmaking in the region is focused on the California half of the Klamath-Siskiyou bioregion. Program activities include new wilderness protections, improving the ecological integrity of the Cascade-Siskiyou National Monument, and restoring the Klamath River watershed.
Additionally, some grants have been awarded to projects in the intermountain west, notably the northern Rockies. Currently, the Foundation has narrowed its work in this region to Montana’s High Divide, a critical wildlife connector between the greater Yellowstone ecosystem and core wilderness areas to the west and northwest.
Targeted habitats include mature forest ecosystems, riparian corridors, and riverine/aquatic environments of demonstrated ecological significance. Target recipients are frequently those groups that (a) have a strong base of activist support, (b) provide unique services or information (legal, scientific, technological, or skills-based), or (c) serve as organizational models by providing genuinely unusual and effective approaches to wildlands conservation.
Given the Foundation’s diverse interests and notwithstanding the above, it is sometimes easier to state what is of little interest to the trustees. These include: marine conservation issues, large national environmental groups, preservation of what is frequently called the “working landscape”, museums, capital construction, animal rights, growth management, toxic contamination, films and videos, wildlife rehabilitation, government-based projects, faith-based organizations, solid waste, energy (with the exception of dams), universities, student fellowships, and basic scientific research.
International Biodiversity Program
Since its inception, the Weeden Foundation has had a strong interest in conservation work internationally. Roughly 30% - 40% of total annual grant expenditure goes to projects outside of the United States, a percentage range that has not changed significantly over the past two decades. This global perspective came about partly through a recognition that most of the planet’s biodiversity is found elsewhere, coupled with an understanding that an American conservation dollar goes much further when spent on the ground in Chile or Russia. To the Weeden trustees, these opportunistic conditions far outweigh the risks typically associated with international grantmaking.
General approaches and targeted natural systems for international grantmaking are not substantially different from those in the domestic program and include mature forest ecosystems, riparian corridors, and riverine/aquatic environments of demonstrated ecological significance. There is also a strong orientation towards facilitating the designation – and enhanced management – of protected areas, including national parks and private reserves.
Within Latin America, the Foundation is focused on supporting groups in Chilean Patagonia, where threats to native forests and wild rivers are substantial. Most grants are made directly to Chilean non-profits, but where appropriate or necessary the Foundation supports cross-fertilizing partnerships with U.S. environmental groups. Major industrial threats to Chilean wildlands come from U.S.-based wood fiber corporations, international aluminum and mining companies, and multinational hydroelectric consortiums.
Until recently, the Foundation has provided grants in Bolivia, where in 1987 in partnership with Conservation International, the Foundation financed the first debt-for-nature swap giving protection to approximately 3.7 million acres of tropical forests and grasslands, creating the Beni Biosphere Reserve. In addition, since 1993 the Foundation has owned El Refugio Huanchaca, a private conservation holding comprising 125,000 acres of dry tropical forest and savanna adjacent to Noel Kempff Mercado National Park. The site is currently a base for arboreal, mammal, and ornithological research. Currently, the Foundation only entertains Bolivian proposals related directly to El Refugio Huanchaca.
Lastly, since the late 1980’s, the Weeden Foundation has had a strong regional interest in Russia, particularly central Siberia. At the time it was created and on into the early 1990’s, the program supported a number of natural resource planning and capacity building efforts in the Lake Baikal region and the Amur River Basin. Currently this program focuses on the Altai region of south central Siberia. The small, semi-autonomous Altai Republic boasts Russia’s second highest mountain range (home to several Red Book species), headwaters of its longest river, and extensive pine forests that are the genetic precursor to Siberia’s massive expanse of related softwood species. Funding in the Altai region is currently restricted to organizations working closely with U.S. partners.
Exclusions from Weeden Foundation international grantmaking include: marine conservation issues, large international groups, agroforestry, museums, capital construction, growth management, toxic contamination, films and videos, wildlife rehabilitation, faith-based organizations, government-based projects, solid waste, energy (with the exception of dams), universities, student fellowships, and basic scientific research.
It should be noted that funding outside the two priority regions of Chilean Patagonia and the Altai Republic is rare.
Land Acquisition Program
The Weeden Foundation made its first grant to acquire threatened biologically diverse habitat in 1983, and over the next three and a half decades it has supported over 45 land acquisition/protected areas projects. While efforts were initially aimed at domestic sites, the Foundation soon came to realize that even with a growing investment portfolio its ability to support the purchase of critical habitat in the United States was severely constrained by high land values. As a result, the late 1980s saw a shift in emphasis to international target sites, mostly in Latin America.
In addition to the debt-for-nature swap and private reserve acquisition in Bolivia, the Foundation has funded projects in Chile, Paraguay, Columbia, Costa Rica, Peru, Ecuador, Belize, and Namibia. In total the Foundation has contributed to efforts that have protected over 6 million acres of important habitat. In early 2015 the Foundation joined together with two other groups -- 1% for the Planet and the Biodiversity and Wildlife Solutions Program at Resolve – to establish the Quick Response Biodiversity Fund (QRBF) in order to acquire critical habitat globally. This land conservation mechanism matches expertise, funds, and urgent needs with a speed unparalleled in the conservation community. QRBF is guided by a volunteer Advisory Council of fifty-five of some of the top global scientists in the biodiversity field. Key criteria in award selection are if and how the investment will help avoid extinction of rare species. Land acquisition proposals were evaluated based upon the following criteria: documented strategic importance to regional biodiversity, local and regional conservation context, leverage, degree of threat, community impacts, and long term stewardship or other appropriate exit strategies.
Currently, the Foundation is directing all land acquisition proposals to the QRBF. For more information about the QRBF, please go to its description on this website.
Population growth, is pushing—or has surpassed—the limits of sustainability; it remains a major factor in the alarming decline of global biodiversity, and threatens the quality of life we seek for ourselves, our descendants, and all people of the planet. The Foundation currently supports high leverage international population projects with advocacy components to influence policy makers and opinion leaders. Additionally, our funds support the creation of approaches to raising awareness about family planning and reproductive health. Over the two past decades, the Foundation has supported such efforts in Nepal, Mexico, and throughout South America.
Currently, only rarely does the Foundation make international population grants to locations outside its target region of South America.
While primarily viewed as a global issue, population growth is equally problematic within the U.S. which is growing faster than any other industrialized nation and which could reach 450 million people (if current trends continue) by the year 2050. The Foundation’s primary domestic population objective is for the U.S. to respond directly to the directives of the President’s Council on Sustainable Development by adopting a national policy dealing effectively and equitably with all sources of U.S. population growth, including immigration, and leading towards population stabilization in the near future. Cultivating support among environmental and population organizations for such a policy is a key goal. The Foundation currently funds projects to: advocate for increased federal funding of family planning clinics (Title X); promote immigration reduction on the basis of environmental concerns; and conduct sprawl studies that break out population growth as a driver of sprawl.
Given the Foundation’s diverse interests and notwithstanding the above, projects of little interest to the trustees include: capital construction, standard reproductive health service delivery programs, films and videos, STD/AIDS prevention, government-based projects, universities, student fellowships, and basic scientific research.
While the Foundation made several energy conservation grants more than twenty years ago, promoting sustainable consumption patterns in the U.S. has become a high priority in the past decade. This new emphasis is largely the result of a fuller understanding of the factors driving biological impoverishment, in particular the rapid pace with which the U.S. industrial corporations must exploit resources all over the globe to supply the insatiable American consumer.
U.S. consumption levels – of wood fiber, fossil fuels, and minerals – far outweigh other industrialized nations with comparable standards of living and greater life expectancies. This tells us our use of these resources is inefficient, and that the costs of production are either being subsidized, externalized, or most likely both.
We have been lucky to embrace the issue at a time when several new provocative and related efforts are emerging. Among these, the Foundation’s interests are centered upon a new and rapidly growing movement to challenge and redirect American consumer and consumption habits. In particular, the Foundation has chosen to build upon its historical interest in native forest conservation by supporting projects aimed at promoting greater efficiency in the use of wood products, particularly paper. This includes encouraging a concerted shift away from wood fiber as a resource where other equally adequate and less damaging substitutes exist. Currently, the Foundation is focusing on the area of sustainable paper consumption and production. Grantmaking in this area aims to expand the market for environmental papers through consumer-targeted education and efforts directed at the book and magazine publishing industries, corporate and government procurement practices, and paper packaging.
Recently, the Foundation established a new consumption program interest that recognizes the importance of integrating the concept of Ecological Sustainability into K-12 education. The initial grants have incorporated the ecological footprint and similar tools to achieve a fuller, more integrated curriculum that connects population growth, over-consumption, environmental degradation, and biological limits. The Foundation is particularly interested in projects that are designed to “scale-up” quickly through cost-effective, high-leverage mechanisms such as teacher development training.
As with the Foundation’s other grant programs, there are several categories within the consumption program area that rarely receive funding. These include: capital construction, museums, films and videos, government-based projects, student fellowships, basic scientific research, large national environmental organizations, recycling and solid waste programs, and toxics.